Nova Publishers
My Account Nova Publishers Shopping Cart
HomeBooksSeriesJournalsReference CollectionseBooksInformationSalesImprintsFor Authors
            
  Top » Catalog » Books » Religion » Religion and Ethics Chapters » My Account  |  Cart Contents  |  Checkout   
Quick Find
  
Use keywords to find the product you are looking for.
Advanced Search
What's New? more
Livelihoods and Vulnerability in the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Southern Africa
$130.00
Shopping Cart more
0 items
Information
Shipping & Returns
Privacy Notice
Conditions of Use
Contact Us
Notifications more
NotificationsNotify me of updates to The Everlasting Conflict: Evolution-and-Science versus Religiosity (pp. 73-98)
Tell A Friend
 
Tell someone you know about this product.
The Everlasting Conflict: Evolution-and-Science versus Religiosity (pp. 73-98) $0.00
Authors:  (Guillermo Paz-y-Miño-C, Avelina Espinosa, Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Massachusetts, USA, and others)
Abstract:
In this chapter, we examine theoretically and quantitatively the relationship science-and-evolution awareness versus religiosity. For this, we use a Cartesian landscape where the dependent variable acceptance of evolution is plotted as function of three factors: religiosity or an individual’s personal belief-convictions, level of understanding the essence of science, and familiarity with the concept of evolution. We contrast acceptance of evolution among five United States (US) and international populations, including: university professors in various disciplines, an equally highly trained group of specialized protisto-biologists, atheists, educators of prospective teachers, and college students (Grand Total N = 1,665 participants in scientific online polling). We discuss evidence in support of the hypothesis that the controversy over evolution-and-science versus religiosity is inherent to the incompatibility between scientific rationalism/empiricism and the belief in supernatural causation. We report that the levels of understanding of science and evolution by the faculty, protisto-biologists, educators, and students decreased with increasing religiosity (= negative association of variables), and that the levels of understanding evolution increased with increasing understanding of science (= positive association of variables). Interestingly, the atheists, who had wide range of educational attainment and zero religiosity, had comparable levels of understanding the foundations of science and evolution to the highly educated faculty and protisto-biologists. The educators and students were the least knowledgeable about science/evolution and the most religious. After comparing our findings with the patterns of acceptance of evolution in the US and the world –and in the context of religiosity— we conclude that if science and religion co-persist in the future, the relationship between them will fluctuate between moderate and intense antagonism. 


Available Options:
Version:

  Open Access item.
  Click below PDF icon for free download.

  

This is an Open Access item. Click above PDF icon for free download.
Special Focus Titles
01.Chaliapin and the Jews: The Question of Chaliapin's Purported Antisemitism
02.The Humanities: Past, Present and Future
03.The Poles: Myths and Reality
04.Child-Rearing: Practices, Attitudes and Cultural Differences
05."A Home Away from Home": A Community of International and South African University Students
06.Palliative Care: Oncology Experience from Hong Kong
07.The Enigma of Autism: Genius, Disorder or Just Different?
08.The Collector Mentality: Modernization of the Hunter-Gatherer
09.Face Processing: Systems, Disorders and Cultural Differences
10.Occurrences, Structure, Biosynthesis, and Health Benefits Based on Their Evidences of Medicinal Phytochemicals in Vegetables and Fruits. Volume 8
11.Crystal Growth: Concepts, Mechanisms and Applications
12.The Economic, Social and Political Impact of Mining on Akyem Abuakwa from the Pre-Colonial Era up to 1943

Nova Science Publishers
© Copyright 2004 - 2017

The Everlasting Conflict: Evolution-and-Science versus Religiosity (pp. 73-98)