Nova Publishers
My Account Nova Publishers Shopping Cart
HomeBooksSeriesJournalsReference CollectionseBooksInformationSalesImprintsFor Authors
  Top » Catalog » Journals » International Journal of Chemical Modeling » Volume 3 Issue 3 Articles » My Account  |  Cart Contents  |  Checkout   
Quick Find
Use keywords to find the product you are looking for.
Advanced Search
What's New? more
Exploring Cities and Countries of the World. Volume 1
Shopping Cart more
0 items
Shipping & Returns
Privacy Notice
Conditions of Use
Contact Us
Notifications more
NotificationsNotify me of updates to The Family Resemblance View of Quantum Mechanics
Tell A Friend
Tell someone you know about this product.
The Family Resemblance View of Quantum Mechanics $45.00
Authors:  Constantin Antonopoulos
In the fifties Wittgenstein surprised the philosophic community (and his own followers) by arguing that there are no real definitions to the words we use, even though we tend to suppose so. All there are, instead, are faint resemblances between the various uses of a word, only erratically matching the putative definition. Strictly speaking, definitions are rarely satisfied as such, if ever. We say that boys play football in the street, a game that has rules, winners and losers. But we also say that little girls play with their dolls, a game that has neither rules, nor winners nor losers. Still we use the same word for both. Wittgenstein coined the famous term “family resemblances” to mark this phenomenon, to him direct testimony of the death of all true generality.
I apply Wittgenstein’s notion of family resemblances to QM in a similar vein. I argue that several discrepant cases in QM, sharing only a faint similarity among them, and a good deal of irreducible differences, are all commonly denoted by physicists by a single name (e.g., “uncertainties” or “wholeness”), and are thus treated as instances of the same principle, exactly as discrepant cases in speech are treated as instantiations of the same name, when in fact they are anything but that in either domain.
In consequence, given the disparities behind the ‘resemblances’, suitably concealed under the same name, what actual experiments confirm from the “family” collection, are not exhaustive of the tested quantum hypothesis, for there are still other family members of the concept to reckon with, which differ from those confirmed, albeit identically named. Hence, only some members of the “family” are confirmed, and the requisite rest not. And then those which are confirmed, given their underlying profound discrepancy with the rest of the “family”, are useless as a genuine support of the theory. 

Available Options:
This Item Is Currently Unavailable.
Special Focus Titles
01.Peter Singer’s Ethics: A Critical Appraisal
02.Sexism: Past, Present and Future Perspectives
03.Body and Politics: Elite Disability Sport in China
04.Childhood and Adolescence: Tribute to Emanuel Chigier, 1928-2017
05.Renal Replacement Therapy: Controversies and Future Trends
06.Food-Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetics, Prevention and Potential Side Effects
07.Terrorism and Violence in Islamic History and Theological Responses to the Arguments of Terrorists
08.International Event Management: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice
09.The Sino-Indian Border War and the Foreign Policies of China and India (1950-1965)
10.Tsunamis: Detection, Risk Assessment and Crisis Management
11.Sediment Watch: Monitoring, Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Management
12.Self-Regulated Learners: Strategies, Performance, and Individual Differences

Nova Science Publishers
© Copyright 2004 - 2018

The Family Resemblance View of Quantum Mechanics